Point particles moving in continous space

med17k
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
does this statement make sense?
If Spacetime is continuous then a zero-dimensional classical particle would require infinite time to pass between 2 points in space because between any 2 points there is an infinite number of points but if classical particles have non zero space dimensions then they can move in the space from point to point . also if spacetime is discrete at the smallest scale then classical point particle can move ordinarily from point to point .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your statement is a modified version of Zeno's paradox. It doesn't take an infinite time between points, since dividing up space also is also dividing up time, so the time is finite.
 
Look up convergence of infinite series. Wikipedia article titled "Convergent Series" might be a good place to start.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top