A Point source with Dirichlet Boundary

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of modeling a point source with Dirichlet boundary conditions in a 2D domain, particularly in heat transfer scenarios. It raises the issue of singularities at the source point, questioning whether the transient solution is ill-defined or can be treated as a weak form. Participants share insights on the high temperature values observed at the source point and suggest integrating the point source into an area for practical applications. There is a consensus that point sources may not be applicable under Dirichlet boundary conditions in real-world situations. The conversation highlights the complexities of theoretical versus practical approaches in heat transfer modeling.
Bruce
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi, all great brains, I have a question about BVP, which confused me a while, maybe someone can help to clarify it.

For a point source with Dirichlet boundary in a 2D domain, the response at any coordinate except the source point is dependent on the surface of the source, for example, heat transfer. But a point source, in theory has no surface in a 2D domain. So the transient solution with Dirichlet point source in a 2D domain is regarded as ill-defined problem(the solution has a singularity at source)? or it can be regarded as a weak form, are there any reference about this? or something is else wrong.

Just use the heat transfer as an example:

d(dT/dx)+d(dT/dy)=dT/dt

BC: T'(0,y,t)=T'(L,y,t)=T'(x,0,t)=T'(x,M,t)=0 ; 0<x<L;0<y<M;

IC: T(x,y,0)=delta(x-x',y-y',t-t') * T0thanks in advance.

Bruce
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to solve this for the long-time solution?
 
hi, chestermiller,

Yes, I can get the solution which gives very high value (>10^6 for T0=100) at source point at t=0. In some practice, source point was integrated into area in a 2D domain, which also works in this case. Then I just have this doubt, point source is not applicable for dirichlet boundary condition in a reality .

ps: source point at (x',z')
242830
 
Last edited:
It looks like you solved it already. What is the problem?
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Let us take the Ampere-Maxwell law $$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0\,\mathbf{J}+\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ Assume we produce a spark that is so fast that the ##\partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t## term in eqn.##(1)## has not yet been produced by Faraday’s law of induction $$\nabla \times \mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ since the current density ##\mathbf{J}## has not yet had time to generate the magnetic field ##\mathbf{B}##. By...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K