A Point source with Dirichlet Boundary

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of modeling a point source with Dirichlet boundary conditions in a 2D domain, particularly in heat transfer scenarios. It raises the issue of singularities at the source point, questioning whether the transient solution is ill-defined or can be treated as a weak form. Participants share insights on the high temperature values observed at the source point and suggest integrating the point source into an area for practical applications. There is a consensus that point sources may not be applicable under Dirichlet boundary conditions in real-world situations. The conversation highlights the complexities of theoretical versus practical approaches in heat transfer modeling.
Bruce
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi, all great brains, I have a question about BVP, which confused me a while, maybe someone can help to clarify it.

For a point source with Dirichlet boundary in a 2D domain, the response at any coordinate except the source point is dependent on the surface of the source, for example, heat transfer. But a point source, in theory has no surface in a 2D domain. So the transient solution with Dirichlet point source in a 2D domain is regarded as ill-defined problem(the solution has a singularity at source)? or it can be regarded as a weak form, are there any reference about this? or something is else wrong.

Just use the heat transfer as an example:

d(dT/dx)+d(dT/dy)=dT/dt

BC: T'(0,y,t)=T'(L,y,t)=T'(x,0,t)=T'(x,M,t)=0 ; 0<x<L;0<y<M;

IC: T(x,y,0)=delta(x-x',y-y',t-t') * T0thanks in advance.

Bruce
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to solve this for the long-time solution?
 
hi, chestermiller,

Yes, I can get the solution which gives very high value (>10^6 for T0=100) at source point at t=0. In some practice, source point was integrated into area in a 2D domain, which also works in this case. Then I just have this doubt, point source is not applicable for dirichlet boundary condition in a reality .

ps: source point at (x',z')
242830
 
Last edited:
It looks like you solved it already. What is the problem?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Back
Top