Pointer Momentum of a Measuring Apparatus

  • Thread starter Thread starter SheikYerbouti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Momentum
SheikYerbouti
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I am writing a paper on the problem of measurement and I am stuck on what the pointer momentum corresponds to physically. The coupling of the pointer momentum with the observable being measured is used to define the interaction Hamiltonian between the measuring apparatus and the system being measured. I understand that the observable conjugate to the pointer momentum is the pointer coordinate/read-out and that the pointer momentum generates the translations in for this coordinate. Is this all that there is to the pointer momentum, or does it correspond to something else as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SheikYerbouti said:
I am writing a paper on the problem of measurement and I am stuck on what the pointer momentum corresponds to physically. The coupling of the pointer momentum with the observable being measured is used to define the interaction Hamiltonian between the measuring apparatus and the system being measured.

Yes - that's how generalised measurements are arrived at:
http://www.quantum.umb.edu/Jacobs/QMT/QMT_Chapter1.pdf

SheikYerbouti said:
I understand that the observable conjugate to the pointer momentum is the pointer coordinate/read-out and that the pointer momentum generates the translations in for this coordinate. Is this all that there is to the pointer momentum, or does it correspond to something else as well?

Well that's all there really is to the momentum operator - but what exactly you mean by 'pointer momentum' in this context I am not sure.

Thanks
Bill
 
By the pointer momentum, I am referring to the observable of the measuring apparatus that is coupled to the observable that is being measured in the system. I don't know if that helped at all, so here is a link that explains the setup: http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap3.pdf. It goes into the model on the second page and I am referring to the P operator. When we discuss the momentum of a particle, there is more to it than simply being the generator of coordinate translations. I was just wondering if there was something similar going on for the pointer momentum in that there was a deeper, manifestly physical interpretation or if it simply is a generator of translation.
 
SheikYerbouti said:
When we discuss the momentum of a particle, there is more to it than simply being the generator of coordinate translations.

Not so sure about that.

See chapter 3 - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development.

It's constrained by the fact probabilities are frame invariant.

Symmetry is its fundamental basis - symmetries implied by probability invariance in QM - symmetries implied by Lagrangian invariance in classical mechanics.

IMHO there is nothing deeper going on - its the magic and mystery of symmetry in physics.

Symmetry tells us what the momentum operator is. But its relation to the measurent problem is another matter - as it is for any observable in QM.

I know that paper you linked to and it is good.

However for understanding the measurement problem in light of modern developments in decoherence I think the following is better:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5439/1/Decoherence_Essay_arXiv_version.pdf

It emphasises the crucial difference between improper and proper mixed states.

An even better reference is Decoherence and the Quantum to Classical Transition by Schlosshauer
https://www.amazon.com/dp/3540357734/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Its my go-to book on such things.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Back
Top