Polar Coordinants and Double Integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Menisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals Polar
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the area enclosed by the intersection of the circles defined by r = sin(t) and r = cos(t). A user initially sets up a double integral but finds the result incorrect, leading to confusion about the bounds and the nature of polar coordinates. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering radial lines instead of vertical ones and suggests using symmetry to simplify the problem. Ultimately, the correct approach involves using a double integral with angles from 0 to π/4 and radius from 0 to sin(t), multiplied by 2 to account for symmetry. The participants clarify the correct setup for the integral, leading to a more reasonable solution.
Menisto
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The problem is to find the area of the piece enclosed by the intersection of the circles r = sin t and r = cos t.

I tried to set up the integral:

Integral[0 to Pi/4]Integral[Sin[t] to Cos[t]] r dr d@

but this doesn't seem work, I get out .25, and just by eyeballing it, I can tell it is less. It seems tricky because the upper bound r = cos [t] is being traced out between the angles Pi/4 and Pi/2, while the lower bound r = sin [t] is being traced out between the angles 0 and Pi/4.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget you're working in polar coordinates, not rectangular ones. You shouldn't be thinking of vertical lines; you should be thinking of radial lines.
 
I'm struggling to see how I would describe this region using only a single double integral, or would I need two?
 
Yah; in polar coordinates, I would expect you either to use two integrals or to take advantage of symmetry.
 
Symmetry: Say if I were to describe the region from the center of the cosine circle. The angle would be from Pi/4 to Pi/2. Now, if I flipped the portion of the sin circle corresponding to these angles, it would again look like the region. Would the radius then go from 0 to Cos[t] - Sin[t]? The answer is much more reasonable, but it still seems like I'm doing something that seems wrong.
 
Would the radius then go from 0 to Cos[t] - Sin[t]?
Nope. Remember, you're looking at radial lines. What are the endpoints of a radial line lying in your shape?
 
I don't get what you're asking. The radial line of the cosine circle would start at [.5, 0] and go to cos[t]?
 
Last edited:
I feel so stupid, It's just the double integral of with angles 0 to pi/4 and radius 0 to sin[t], times 2 (symmetry).
 
That sounds right!
 
  • #10
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K