Polarization 4-vectors to get matrix element in QFT

jameson2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I'm working through the start of the Quantum Field Theory book by Peskin and Schroeder. The first section deals with an electron and positron colliding to give a positive and negative muon traveling along a line at an angle theta to the line of the e,p collision.(This is using center of mass coordinates). Calculating the matrix elements involves working out the polarization vectors of each particle. For the case in the book it gives (0,1,i,0) for the elctron and (0,cos theta, i, sin theta). I don't know how they get these though. They also give the other matrix elements without proof. Could anyone explain to me how to work out these vectors?
Thanks alot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jameson2 said:
[...] Calculating the matrix elements involves working out the polarization vectors of each particle. For the case in the book it gives (0,1,i,0) for the electron and (0,cos theta, i, sin theta). I don't know how they get these though.

Actually, the polarization vector \epsilon^\mu = (0,1,i,0) refers to the intermediate photon, not the electron. So it's just a standard result from classical electrodynamics for circularly polarized light (corresponding to a angular momentum eigenstate in the quantum case). See, e.g., Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" for more detail on the classical aspects.

To get the other vector (0,\cos\theta, i, -\sin\theta), just involves a standard rotation matrix in the xz plane. E.g., (suppressing the t,y components),
<br /> \pmatrix{\cos\theta &amp; \sin\theta \cr -\sin\theta &amp; \cos\theta} \pmatrix{1 \cr 0}<br /> ~=~ \pmatrix{\cos\theta \cr -\sin\theta} <br />
They also give the other matrix elements without proof.

Remember that ch1 is only meant to be an "invitation", or a "taste". Such cases are worked out in far more detail later in the book.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top