The discussion centers on the ethical framework guiding the current presidential administration, questioning whether decisions are influenced by religious ethics, utilitarianism, or egoism. There is a strong critique of perceived moral vacuity, suggesting that the administration operates without a true ethical compass, driven instead by the interests of the wealthy elite. The analogy to Marie Antoinette highlights a disconnect between leadership and the populace, with accusations of negligence regarding issues like Gulf War Syndrome and the handling of nuclear waste. The conversation also touches on the duality of public religious rhetoric versus the practical utilitarian decisions made in power, particularly criticizing the administration's approach to preemptive war and its implications for morality. Overall, the sentiment is that the administration's actions reflect a non-ethical, immoral stance rather than a coherent ethical theory.