Polynomial find the range of root

scoutfai
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
The question is : Show that one of the root of the equation y^3 - 3y + 4 = 0 lies between -3 and -2.

REMEMBER : If you want to use some statement, Law, identity or logic, please PROVE it first before you proceed to answer the question..

Difficulty for me is, normally we are asked to solve for the exact value of the roots when given an equation, but now we are asked to find the range for one of the roots, hence i feel so weird and have no idea how to continute.
Any expert, if you know, please teach me, i appreciate u help, thanks you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ok, imagine that a function f(y)=y^3 - 3y + 4

The question is asking at what point that function equals zero. (which is what "the root of the equation" means. The easiest way to understand how to solve this problem is to plot the function f(y) against y on graph for some values between -3 and 2. You will find that somewhere in this range your graph will cut the x-axis. The x-axis value at this point is known as the root of the equation.

Now to prove this mathematically, all you need to do is find the value of f(y) for y=-3 and then find the value of f(y) for y=2. You will find that the answers to f(-3) and f(2) have opposite signs, which graphically means that the point of your curve for f(-3) lies on the opposite side of the x-axis than the point of your curve for f(2).

Now if you think about it, if the curve is above the x-axis at one point and below the x-axis at the other, it must mean that somewhere between those two values (-3 and 2) your curve cuts the x axis!

Remember that where the curve cuts the x-axis is where the root is (this is the point where f(y) = 0). Therefore, the root must be between -3 and 2.
 
Let f(y) = y^3 -3y+4
f is defined over the whole real axis, and is continuous everywhere because it is a polynomial. Now f(-3)<0 and f(-2)>0. The function has to vanish somewhere in between.

Think about the curve representing the function. It has to cross the axis somewhere.

_______________________________________________________

Crumbles was faster than me, and brought a better explanation... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top