jnimagine
- 176
- 0
what does the soundwaves of a poor quality sound look like??
and richer quality?
and richer quality?
interested_learner said:"Higher" quality sound has (in general) more harmonics than poorer sounding sound. For instance, an orchestra can produce a richer sound than an electric guitar even though they may be just as loud. There are a lot of details like how the harmonics work together, etc, but in general that is the difference.
So if you take a FFT of the orchestra, you will see a lot of small spikes at a large number of frequencies in addition to the larger spikes while the guitar would have a much simplier spectrum.
sas3 said:Well, if you have clipping (sounds very bad) it just looks like the peeks are cut off.
If you run a sinusoidal signal through a solid-state amplifier (look at sa3's graphs) the amplifier will produce it very accurately until you try to increase the volume past the capacity of the amplifier. At that point (and thereafter) the amp will "clip". It will not be able to reproduce the entire waveform, so the peaks (the most positive and negative excursions) will have flat spots (clipping) with very sharp transitions (the squared-off corners) that sound very harsh. Tube-driven amplifiers do not clip as sharply, and have a more complex waveform when they do clip, so they are more pleasant to listen to when overdriven. When you listen to Angus Young (AC/DC), Eric Clapton, Stevie Ray Vaughan, or almost any other top guitarist, you are listening to them performing on tube amps - the complexity of the tone is essential to their distinctive sounds. There are a few top guitarists who use solid-state amplifiers, like BB King, but they are in a very distinct minority.jnimagine said:I'm not quite sure about what you mean by "the peeks are cut off".![]()