Position and momentum commutators

benabean
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Can I write:

[\hat{p^2},\hat{x}]\hat{p} = \hat{p}[\hat{p^2}, \hat{x}]

in relation to position and momentum operators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think? can you show that you can do it?

I think this is a good exercise in commutator algebra for you :-)
 
\hat{C}[\hat{A},\hat{B}]=\hat{C}\hat{A}\hat{B}-\hat{C}\hat{B}\hat{A}
[\hat{A},\hat{B}]\hat{C}=\hat{A}\hat{B}\hat{C}-\hat{B}\hat{A}\hat{C}
These two can't be the same as they are operators and the order matters.
 
hey come on, don't write the answer just like that
 
I was just wondering if there was an identity for such an expression. (Looking at thesage's post, it was a silly assumption; i should have remembered that expansion!)

It stems from trying to prove that [\hat{H},\hat{x}\hat{p}] = [\hat{H},\hat{p}\hat{x}].

I did get this proof in the end. I was going wrong by not writing out p_hat explicitly, hence were my original post came from.

Thanks for your feedback,
regards benabean.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top