Position and Momentum: Uncovering the Mystery

SUDOnym
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
In classical physics, the two quantities that you need to know about a particle to describe it completely at an instant is x and p - position and momentum.
Why is it that momentum is chosen as the second quantity - ie. couldn't we describe the particle equally well with x and v - position and velocity?
Am I missing something or is chosing momentum just convention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes we can. In fact, in the Lagrangian formulation of Mechanics, it is x and v which evolve in time. For Hamiltonian mechanics, we choose x and p. The decision is not entirely convention, there are some insights into the nature of mechanics which are afforded to us by using the Hamiltonian formulation.

For more information, you can look up Hamiltonian Mechanics.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top