Position Barlow Lens for 3x Image w/ Focal Length -0.05m

  • Thread starter Thread starter recon9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Optics
AI Thread Summary
To achieve a 3x magnification using a barlow lens with a focal length of -0.05m, it is essential to determine the correct placement of the lens relative to the image created by the first lens. The relevant formulas include m = -(S'/S) and S' = -mS + (1/f). By substituting the values for magnification (m = 3) and focal length (f = -0.05m), the calculation yields S' = -3S + 20. This indicates that the barlow lens should be positioned 20 cm in front of the image produced by the first lens to achieve the desired magnification. Proper placement is crucial for optimal telescope performance.
recon9
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
1. I am trying to figure out a problem involving a barlow lens in a telescope. All I know is that the focal length of the lens is -0.05m. I want to know where to place the barlow lens in front of the image created by the first lens (as if the barlow wasnt there) in order to get an image 3x the size as the image created by the first lens(as if the barlow wasnt there)



2. I know that (1/S)+(1/S')=(1/f) and m = -(S'/S).



3. I drew a diagram and filled in some variables then tried to equate the above solutions but that gave me an answer with an unknown still in it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
4. To solve this problem, we can use the formula m = -(S'/S)+(1/f). This tells us that S' = -mS + (1/f). We can then use this equation to calculate S' given the focal length of the lens (f) and the magnification (m) of the barlow lens. In this case, f = -0.05m and m = 3. Therefore, S' = -(3)(S) + (1/-0.05) = -3S + 20. So the barlow lens should be placed 20 cm in front of the image created by the first lens to get an image 3x the size as the image created by the first lens.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top