Position function x(t) question

  • Thread starter Thread starter becksftw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Position
becksftw
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
the problem is given a(t)=4(t+3)^2, v0=-1, x0=1 find x(t), the position function

to my knowledge x(t)= 1/2at^2+v0t+x0

I tried it and got the wrong answer, the answer the book gives is: 1/3(t+3)^4 - 37t -26

I did:

x(t)= 1/2 [4(t+3)^2)]t^2 - 1t +1
eventually getting: 4t^2 + 24t + 9 for the part in parenthesis
and 2t^4 +12t^2 + 9/2t^2 after multiplying by t^2 and then 1/2

What I'm getting it shaping up to look nothing like the answer, so I know I'm missing something big here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
becksftw said:
the problem is given a(t)=4(t+3)^2, v0=-1, x0=1 find x(t), the position function

to my knowledge x(t)= 1/2at^2+v0t+x0
This expression for x(t) relies on the assumption that the acceleration is constant, which is not the case here.
I tried it and got the wrong answer, the answer the book gives is: 1/3(t+3)^4 - 37t -26

I did:

x(t)= 1/2 [4(t+3)^2)]t^2 - 1t +1
eventually getting: 4t^2 + 24t + 9 for the part in parenthesis
and 2t^4 +12t^2 + 9/2t^2 after multiplying by t^2 and then 1/2

What I'm getting it shaping up to look nothing like the answer, so I know I'm missing something big here.
By definition, you have a(t)=v'(t) and v(t)=x'(t). If you start with a(t)=constant, you can derive the equation x(t)=x0+v0t+1/2at2. This is probably covered in your textbook or notes.

In this problem, you want to do the same thing except start with the given expression for a(t).
 
Its for a course that already expects you to remember to remember this, we're just doing the quick review chapter in the beginning. I've never taken physics though, so I hardly every deal with this stuff, so I forgot exactly how to go about the problem. So are you saying then that I want to integrate a(t)?
 
*integrate a(t) twice
 
Yes, and use the initial conditions to determine the constants of integration.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top