Position of Block on Incline w/ & w/o Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksle82
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Incline
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the position of a block on an incline over time, considering both friction and frictionless scenarios. The proposed equations for the block's position are x(t) = 0.5g(cos(theta) - sin(theta))t^2 with friction and x(t) = 0.5gsin(theta)t^2 without friction. Participants question the absence of the coefficient of kinetic friction in the calculations, noting that it is typically denoted as mu (u) and can be related to the angle of incline. Clarifications are made regarding the x-axis orientation along the incline and the distinction between static and kinetic friction coefficients. The free body diagram provided is acknowledged as acceptable.
ksle82
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Find the position of the block as a function of time for both cases:
a)friction
b)frictionless

Here're my answers. Please check to see if they're correct. The free body diagram are attached.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=7068&stc=1&d=1149476915
slidingblock.JPG

a) x(t)= .5g(cos(theta)-sin(theta))t^2
b) x(t)= .5gsin(theta)t^2
 

Attachments

  • slidingblock.JPG
    slidingblock.JPG
    9.6 KB · Views: 646
Physics news on Phys.org
Although I can't see your attachments , where's the coefficient of kinetic friction in the first part of the question ?
Also is your X-axis along the incline ?
 
arunbg said:
Although I can't see your attachments , where's the coefficient of kinetic friction in the first part of the question ?
Also is your X-axis along the incline ?

coefficient of friction is not given, so i just assume it's mu (u). i don't know if one can do this or not. But if one has to calculate it, u is usually tan(theta).


And yes, x-axis is along the incline.
 
ksle82 said:
coefficient of friction is not given, so i just assume it's mu (u). i don't know if one can do this or not. But if one has to calculate it, u is usually tan(theta).
That's not true, in general. What you are probably thinking of is the relationship between the coefficient of static friction (between an object and a surface) and the (special) angle at which the object just begins to slide. For that specific angle, \mu_s = \tan\theta.

But what you what is the coefficient of kinetic (sliding) friction, assuming the object starts from almost rest. What's the exact statement of the problem?

Your free body diagram looks OK to me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top