Position Vector: Why Does it Always Point Radially Outward?

AI Thread Summary
The position vector points radially outward in circular motion primarily because it is defined relative to a chosen origin, typically the center of the circle. This radial orientation simplifies calculations by allowing the separation of motion into radial, tangential, and normal components, which are more relevant in curvilinear motion. The relationship between position and velocity, where velocity is tangent to the path, supports this radial definition. Additionally, using radial coordinates streamlines analysis in various fields, including fluid dynamics. Ultimately, the choice of a radial position vector enhances clarity and efficiency in mathematical modeling.
Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
I was wondering, why does the position vector always points radially out from the center (for example, in circular motion). I figure that this is because \vec{v} = \frac{d \vec{r}}{dt} and the velocity should always be tangent to the "curve" (because of Newton's first law).

But is there any other reason to make the position vector point radially outward??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It only points radially outward because you choose your origin at a specific point. I could just as easily decide the origin is on some pint of the circular pathway, though the math would be a tad more difficult.
 
Swapnil said:
I was wondering, why does the position vector always points radially out from the center (for example, in circular motion). I figure that this is because \vec{v} = \frac{d \vec{r}}{dt} and the velocity should always be tangent to the "curve" (because of Newton's first law).

But is there any other reason to make the position vector point radially outward??

Well, that is why its called the radial position. :wink:

You have three components. One is radial, one is tangent, and one is normal to the two of those. We use them becuase they are useful in curvilinear motion. If we used x,y,z vectors, we would have components in all 3 directions. Using radial coordinates we do not have to find components along the directions we care about. It just makes life easier. And, as you will find later in life, it is essential in fluid dynamics for the bernoulli equation.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top