Positive Thinking: Math Struggles & How to Overcome Them

  • Thread starter Thread starter LT72884
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Positive Thinking
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student's experience transitioning from a dislike of math in high school to taking Calculus II after achieving a solid grade in Calculus I. Despite a positive attitude and appreciation for their instructor, the student struggled with their first test, scoring 66%, and expressed frustration with the new material, particularly in applying the correct formulas. They noted spending significant time on homework, indicating that understanding the logic behind formulas is crucial for their success. The student acknowledged the challenge of knowing when to use specific formulas and recognized the need for more focused study. The absence of a grading curve at their school adds to the pressure of performing well in math classes. Overall, the emphasis is on the importance of understanding concepts rather than rote memorization of formulas.
LT72884
Messages
335
Reaction score
49
All right guys. A lil history bout me. in high school (10 years ago) i hated math, now i like it. Never went far with it in high school. Failed trig a year and a half ago. had to retake. Now I am in my first EVER calc2 class. Finished calc 1 with a high 80's (87 or so). Now I am in calc2 and i bombed my first test. 66% average was about 60% or so. I LOVE my instructor and i had him for calc1. So, guidance from people would be nice. I am trying to stay positive and realize that its just a test. its the learning i need to focus on. I have tried to understand the material but it is soooooo new to me and i have no physics behind me at all either. Mainly, its knowing which formula to use. it took me 4 or 5 hours to complete 4 volume problems... it just makes no sense. haha. anyway i find positive thinking is a BIG key to figuring out what to do next

He doesn't curve. Our school doesn't allow it for certain math classes. makes it harder.

thanks guys
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
LT72884 said:
Mainly, its knowing which formula to use.

This approach has never worked for me. If I understand the logic behind the ideas and I understand where the formulas come from, then I do well on tests. Some people make 'plug and chug' work but I see very few doing it successfully(at least by my standards). I never could and I've always been quite successful in my math classes.

LT72884 said:
it took me 4 or 5 hours to complete 4 volume problems...

This is not an inordinate amount of time to spend on new material. I've spent ~12 hours in the past two days working on 12 homework problems.
 
Last edited:
ChaseDuncan said:
This approach has never worked for me. If I understand the logic behind the ideas and I understand where the formulas come from, then I do well on tests. Some people make 'plug and chug' work but I see very few doing it successfully(at least by my standards). I never could and I've always been quite successful in my math classes.



This is not an inordinate amount of time to spend on new material. I've spent ~12 hours in the past two days working on 12 homework problems.

My problem was knowing when to use it or which one. haha. I now the logic behind the formulas for the most part. IE w=fd, but using an integrated approach. However, it is hard for me to see how the force or distance is in the equation. IE a 120 foot cable hanging off the roof. how much work does it take to wind it up? it weighs 3lb/ft. i did not study those enough and my grade reflects it. haha I need to study more honestly
, or at least i think i do.

thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top