Possible analytical solution of transcendental equation by an assumption.

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of solving a transcendental equation involving sinh(k) and making the assumption that bl >> 1. The speaker believes it is not possible, but an article they found presents a solution based on that assumption. The solution involves finding the energy of bound states in an infinite one dimensional regular lattice with two embedded impurities. The solution is not exact, but its precision depends on the accuracy of the assumption.
  • #1
Azorspace
9
0
Is it possible to solve the next transcendental equation analytically (obviously for k):

sinh(k)=(b/2)(1+(e^(-2kl)))

making the assumption that (bl >>1). I think that is not possible, but in an article that i found,
they solve it by making that assumption, and they reach to the solution:

E=Eo+(d/2)

where:

E=-2cosh(k), Eo=-{(4+b²)^(1/2)}, and d=(2b²/|Eo|)(e^(-bl))

physically this problem corresponds to that of finding the energy of bound states in an infinite one dimensional regular lattice, with two embedded impurities.

Thanks everybody in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well... the solution they get isn't exact. But its precision is as great as the "goodness" of their assumption. In other words, as they assumed that bl>>1, as greater bl were, as precise their solution will be.
 

What is a transcendental equation?

A transcendental equation is an equation that involves both transcendental functions (such as trigonometric, exponential, or logarithmic functions) and algebraic expressions.

Why is it difficult to find an analytical solution for a transcendental equation?

Transcendental equations often cannot be solved using traditional algebraic methods, as they involve functions that cannot be expressed in terms of finite combinations of algebraic operations. Therefore, finding an analytical solution requires the use of special techniques and assumptions.

What is the assumption method for solving a transcendental equation?

The assumption method involves making an initial guess or assumption for the solution of a transcendental equation, and then using iterative techniques to refine the solution until it converges to a more accurate value.

Can the assumption method guarantee an exact analytical solution?

No, the assumption method can only provide an approximate solution to a transcendental equation. It is not guaranteed to give an exact analytical solution, but it can provide a close approximation depending on the accuracy of the initial assumption and the number of iterations used.

Are there other methods for solving transcendental equations?

Yes, there are other methods such as numerical methods (such as Newton's method or the bisection method) which involve approximating the solution using numerical calculations. These methods can also provide accurate solutions, but they may require more computational power compared to the assumption method.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
699
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top