Possible number of combinations.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dE_logics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinations
dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
I just wanted to confirm this...suppose we need to rearrange n number of objects, the possible ways they can be rearranged is n!

If suppose at the first place, one of the objects cannot be admitted...then it will be (n-1)*(n-1)*(n-2)*(n-3)...right?

Instead of the first place, suppose, an object cannot be admitted to any other place...it won't make any difference right?...I mean, the total combinations will still be (n-1)*(n-1)*(n-2)*(n-3)?

Also related to the above question, if we have n 'types' of objects infinite in quantity (actually it's more of permutation) and one of them cannot be admitted to a place (not necessarily the first)...then the possible number of combinations will be (n-1)*n*n*n...etc...right? Also in case of multiple exceptions for instance object 'x' cannot be admitted to first, second and third place or object 'x' cannot be admitted to first, object 'y' cannot be admitted to second and finally object 'z' cannot be admitted to the third place, then will the possible combinations will be (n-1)*(n-1)*(n-1)*n*n*n... etc ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is it that no one is understanding the question?
 
dE_logics said:
I just wanted to confirm this...suppose we need to rearrange n number of objects, the possible ways they can be rearranged is n!

If suppose at the first place, one of the objects cannot be admitted...then it will be (n-1)*(n-1)*(n-2)*(n-3)...right?
Yes. The total number of combinations without the constraint is n!. The constraint removes (n-1)! combinations so the total number is:
n! - (n-1)! = n*(n-1)! - (n-1)! = (n-1)(n-1)! = (n-1)(n-1)(n-2)...*2*1
Instead of the first place, suppose, an object cannot be admitted to any other place...it won't make any difference right?...I mean, the total combinations will still be (n-1)*(n-1)*(n-2)*(n-3)?
How could it matter?

Also related to the above question, if we have n 'types' of objects infinite in quantity (actually it's more of permutation) and one of them cannot be admitted to a place (not necessarily the first)...then the possible number of combinations will be (n-1)*n*n*n...etc...right? Also in case of multiple exceptions for instance object 'x' cannot be admitted to first, second and third place or object 'x' cannot be admitted to first, object 'y' cannot be admitted to second and finally object 'z' cannot be admitted to the third place, then will the possible combinations will be (n-1)*(n-1)*(n-1)*n*n*n... etc ?
correct
 
Last edited:
n! - (n-1)! = n*(n-1)! - (n-1)! = (n-1)(n-1)! = (n-1)(n-1)(n-2)...*2*1

So I'm right?

How could it matter?

Ok, thanks.

correct

Again...thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top