Possible Replication Mechanisms for Phage RNA in Offspring

  • Thread starter Thread starter coookiemonste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rna
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how an RNA phage can produce offspring with identical RNA strands despite packaging only one strand. Participants suggest considering various replication mechanisms beyond mitosis, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of RNA replication processes. The conversation encourages brainstorming potential replication-like processes for RNA and DNA. It highlights the importance of proposing possible mechanisms rather than confirming existing knowledge. Overall, the focus is on stimulating critical thinking about RNA phage replication.
coookiemonste
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the genome of an RNA phage where only one strand of RNA is packaged into the phage. How can this phage produce many offspring that all have the same strand of RNA?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


mitosis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's just a word, you are asked for a mechanism.

How does any other replication happen? What other replication-like processes do you know for RNA? Or DNA?

I think you are only asked to propose some possibilities, which is slightly easier than finding out what actually happens but prepares the mind for it.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top