Possible to evaluate the gamma function analytically?

LeBrad
Messages
214
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know if it's possible to evaluate the gamma function analytically? I know it becomes a factorial for integers, and there's a trick involving a switch to polar coordinates for half values, but what about any other number? I have tried using a Taylor expansion and residue integration, but neither seems to work. Just curious if it's possible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, let me PM this to Ed Witten.
 
There are several representations. The best known is in terms of an integral
<br /> \Gamma (z) = \int_{0}^\infty t^{z-1} e^{-t} dt<br />
 
I understand that, but I'm looking for a non-numerical solution to that integral for a value of z such as Pi. The integral is impossible to evaluate in closed form, but is there some other way?
 
I can't claim expertize on the gamma function, but from what I have able to find, the only closed form values are for integer or half integer values of z.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top