Possible webpage title: Does Increased Inertia Lead to Higher Capillary Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capillary Inertia
AI Thread Summary
Increased inertia in a fluid is believed to lead to higher capillary numbers, as the capillary number (Ca) is defined as the ratio of viscous to surface tension effects, expressed as Ca = μV/σ. As inertia increases, velocity also increases, suggesting that Ca would rise if all other factors remain constant. The relationship between inertial and viscous effects is captured by the Reynolds number, while the product of inertial and capillary effects is represented by the formula ρV²L/σ. This indicates that higher velocity, driven by increased inertia, correlates with a higher capillary number. Therefore, the discussion concludes that more inertia likely results in a higher capillary number.
member 428835
Hi PF!

The capillary number is defined as ##Ca = \mu V/\sigma##. Does more inertia in a fluid increase the capillary number?

As inertia increases, it's my intuition that so does velocity. Then it seems (all else constant) that ##Ca## increases too. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The capillary number represents the ratio of viscous to surface tension effects. The ratio of inertial to viscous effects is determined by the Reynolds number. So, the product of the two is the ratio of inertial to capillary effects. What does this give you? What are you defining as inertia?
 
/
Chestermiller said:
What does this give you? What are you defining as inertia?
This gives us ##\rho V^2 L / \sigma##, which is the velocity dependence I would expect. I know inertia characteristically scales proportional to ##V^2##. Holding everything constant but letting velocity change implies more inertial yields higher capillary number. Thanks for the help!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
12K
Back
Top