Possible webpage title: Understanding Multiple Axes of Rotation in Objects

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of multiple axes of rotation in objects, particularly using the analogy of a coin. Participants explore whether an object can have more than one axis of rotation simultaneously, examining implications in both theoretical and practical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if an object, like a coin, can rotate around two axes at the same time, expressing confusion about how this is possible.
  • Another participant suggests that gyroscopes demonstrate multiple axes of rotation, although the relevance to the original question is uncertain.
  • A theorem is presented stating that a rigid body with a fixed point and nonzero angular velocity has a unique axis of rotation at any moment.
  • Some participants argue against the possibility of multiple axes, stating that having two axes of rotation is analogous to having two speed vectors, which is not feasible.
  • There is a discussion about how to visualize rotation on two axes using the analogy of a coin and a ball, with emphasis on identifying points that do not move during rotation.
  • Questions arise about whether the axes must be perpendicular and if there is a limit to the number of axes an object can have simultaneously.
  • Some participants express a need for clearer explanations and a more solid understanding of the physics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether multiple axes of rotation are possible. There are competing views on the nature of rotation and the implications of angular velocity, leading to an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants acknowledge the need for more foundational understanding of physics concepts to engage with the topic effectively. There are references to vector addition and angular velocity, but the discussion remains complex and nuanced.

Hoophy
Messages
90
Reaction score
61
So I am having trouble with this one, I was wondering if an object could have more than one axis of rotation. More than one axis of rotation goes against what I think is possible until I thought about a coin, at which point I was stumped, if the coin was rotating in the way a coin rotates when you spin it like a spinning top but was also spinning in a way in which it resembles a wheels rotation BOTH AT THE SAME TIME, would it have two axis of rotation? If so how is that possible and If not what would the single axis look like? Also for simplicity sake imagine that the coin is rotating in outer space. I am so utterly confused. I would really appreciate an explanation of why this is the way it is. Thank you for your time.
 

Attachments

  • ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1463071068.049004.jpg
    ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1463071068.049004.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 744
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: olgerm
Physics news on Phys.org
Hoophy said:
So I am having trouble with this one, I was wondering if an object could have more than one axis of rotation. More than one axis of rotation goes against what I think is possible until I thought about a coin, at which point I was stumped, if the coin was rotating in the way a coin rotates when you spin it like a spinning top but was also spinning in a way in which it resembles a wheels rotation BOTH AT THE SAME TIME, would it have two axis of rotation? If so how is that possible and If not what would the single axis look like? Also for simplicity sake imagine that the coin is rotating in outer space. I am so utterly confused. I would really appreciate an explanation of why this is the way it is. Thank you for your time.
Sure. Gyroscopes do it all the time... :smile:

EDIT -- But see post #6 below for how to add the various rotations vectorially.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/3D_Gyroscope.png
3D_Gyroscope.png
 
Last edited:
Theorem. Suppose that a rigid body has a fixed point and moves with nonzero angular velocity: ##\boldsymbol \omega\ne 0##. Then at each moment of time there exists a unique line belonging to the rigid body such that the velocity of any point of this line is equal zero.

This line is referred to as axis of rotation
 
Hoophy said:
if an object could have more than one axis of rotation.
No.

Hoophy said:
More than one axis of rotation goes against what I think is possible until I thought about a coin, at which point I was stumped, if the coin was rotating in the way a coin rotates when you spin it like a spinning top but was also spinning in a way in which it resembles a wheels rotation BOTH AT THE SAME TIME, would it have two axis of rotation?
It is analogues to how a car may move forward on road and same move to one side of road (change lane), but does not have 2 speed vectors.
 
Last edited:
I still do not understand. I don't know if the gyroscope applies to what I'm thinking, I meant a more "solid" object. How would an object rotate on 2 axis using the analogy of a coin? Imagine you are trying to explain this to a dummy. (That's me)
 
Hoophy said:
I still do not understand. I don't know if the gyroscope applies to what I'm thinking, I meant a more "solid" object. How would an object rotate on 2 axis using the analogy of a coin? Imagine you are trying to explain this to a dummy. (That's me)

How would you describe this?
 
Hoophy said:
If so how is that possible and If not what would the single axis look like?
  1. Take a coin and spin it the way you described.
  2. Now take a ball and spin it the same way (same direction) as coin.
  3. Notice 2 points on the ball, which are not moving(because of spinning).
  4. Imagine line, which includes both of these points. This line is rotation axis.
  5. Consider, that rotation axis of the coin is parallel with rotation axis of the ball.
 
anorlunda said:
How would you describe this?
That's a good training question by the way. The coin loses its height because of the energy expires for friction of table. Consider an ideal model. The edge of coin does not slip on table's surface. It is not hard to write formulas and describe motion when the centre of coin runs by the horizontal circle and the absolute value of the center's velocity remains constant. For example, precise formulation may be as follows. Assume that we know absolute value of center's velocity and we know the angle between the table and the plane of coin. Find the radius of the circle which the center of coin describes. The radius of coin is also known.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
So then would the two axis of any object have to be perpendicular to each other? And is there a limit to the number of axis an object can have at the same time?
 
  • #11
Hoophy said:
So then would the two axis of any object have to be perpendicular to each other? And is there a limit to the number of axis an object can have at the same time?
You can decompose the total angular velocity vector into arbitrary many vectors.
 
  • #12
A.T. said:
You can decompose the total angular velocity vector into arbitrary many vectors.
Could you please elaborate?
 
  • #14
I hoped that the OP would respond to that video. I wanted to find out whether precession and rotation mean the same thing in his vocabulary.
 
  • #15
Standard fact.

Let ##\Sigma## stand for a rigid body that moves in space. Assume that its angular velocity does not vanish: ##\boldsymbol\omega\ne 0.##

Theorem. There exists a unique line ##\ell=\ell(t)\subset \Sigma## such that for any point ##B\in\ell## it follows that the velocity ##\boldsymbol v_B## (of the point ##B##) is parallel to the line ##\ell##.
This line is parallel to the vector ##\boldsymbol\omega## and velocities of each point of this line are the same.
Moreover, if we know velocity of some point ##O\in\Sigma## then we can find a point ##A\in\ell## by the formula ##\boldsymbol {OA}=\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol\omega|^2}\boldsymbol\omega\times\boldsymbol v_O.##
 
  • #16
I think perhaps my question is way to broad and not very clear. I don't think that this can be explained to me because I need a more solid understanding of physics. Thanks for trying, I will do some more research on my own. Thanks again everybody.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
anorlunda said:
How would you describe this?

Nice video!
For this, external forces are being applied to the disc: it is in a gravitational field, applying downward force, and upward force is applied where the disc contacts the mirror.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K