Posting vs Publishing: Benefits & Dangers

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcjosep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Publishing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the value of publishing academic work versus simply posting theories or concepts online, particularly for individuals not pursuing a career or advanced degrees. Key points include the importance of validation that comes from publishing in reputable, peer-reviewed journals, which is seen as a mark of credibility that online postings lack. While some argue that published articles can also fade into obscurity, the consensus is that they are more likely to be archived and cited, providing a lasting impact that informal online posts do not offer. The conversation highlights concerns about the proliferation of unverified information on the internet and the need for honest peer review in scholarly communication.
mcjosep
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
If a person is in no need to publish anything for a career or to get their PHD then what is the benefit to publishing work vs just posting it on the internet if all you are trying to do is spread a theory/concept?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mcjosep said:
If a person is in no need to publish anything for a career or to get their PHD then what is the benefit to publishing work vs just posting it on the internet if all you are trying to do is spread a theory/concept?

Because there's a gazillion of this type of garbage floating around the 'net. What would be the point of putting another one out there simply for it to disappear into oblivion?

Zz.
 
mcjosep said:
If a person is in no need to publish anything for a career or to get their PHD then what is the benefit to publishing work vs just posting it on the internet if all you are trying to do is spread a theory/concept?
Validation. Posting on the internet gets you ZERO validation. Only publishing in a mainstream, approved, peer reviewed journal counts. Don't be fooled by predatory journals that will publish any garbage if you pay them.
 
I suppose, it just seems there should be a better way to do it. To have honest peer reviews is a valuable thing.
Per ZapperZ's comment though, I feel like a published article could slip into oblivion just as easily.
 
mcjosep said:
I suppose, it just seems there should be a better way to do it. To have honest peer reviews is a valuable thing.
Per ZapperZ's comment though, I feel like a published article could slip into oblivion just as easily.

Publishing doesn't guarantee notoriety or recognition. But your work is forever archived and recorded long after you are gone. And if it is in one of the more reputable journals, it is almost a guarantee that you WILL get several citations.

Nothing similar can be said about posting some random, unverified ideas just on the web. So no, I disagree with the "just as easily" categorization. Slipping into oblivion is easier and more likely for such postings.

Zz.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top