Potential Barrier for different types of junctions

Joseph8022
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
How I can calculate the Potential Barrier when we have a metal- semiconductor, metal- metal, or p-n junction ? Can I calculate the Potential Barrier by using a workfuncion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
The exact shape of the barrier is usually modeled using self-consistent calculations - depending on the exact structures being modeled.

The height of the barrier can sometimes be worked out from the band-mismatch.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Welcome to PF;
The exact shape of the barrier is usually modeled using self-consistent calculations - depending on the exact structures being modeled.

The height of the barrier can sometimes be worked out from the band-mismatch.

Thank you! I have a lot of formulas for calculating the Potential Barrier, and I get confused with them. I'm not sure about it ! In p-n junction, can I find the Potential Barrier by finding the difference in Fermi energy of the p and n-type junction? What about if I have a metal-semiconductor junction ?
 
You should be able to make out what your formulas are about by sketching the band profiles next to each other.
At the junction you'd get some band bending irl.
 
Simon Bridge said:
You should be able to make out what your formulas are about by sketching the band profiles next to each other.
At the junction you'd get some band bending irl.


Thank you, again ! I need to know the formula for calculating the Potential Barrier in p-n junction, please, write it down if you know it.
 
In general?

It's a self-consistent calculation using Poisson's equation to work out the band bending and the Schrodinger equation to work out the charge distribution. Rinse and repeat. What level education are you doing this at? Did you have a specific p-n junction in mind?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top