Potential due to a line charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential due to a line charge Q along the x-axis from +a to -a. The initial expression for potential, phi(x), appears to lack x dependence, raising doubts about its correctness. Participants highlight the importance of the integration constant and the role of charge density, which is defined as rho = Q/2a. It is clarified that the charge density cannot be treated as constant when integrating, as it varies with the position x. The correct approach involves integrating dq/r, where r is the distance from the point of interest to the infinitesimal charge dq.
jason12345
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a line charge Q along the x-axis from +a to -a. Simple integration should give the potential at any point x as:

phi(x) = 1/(4pi epsilon) Q/L loge((x+a)/(x-a))

= 1/(4pi epsilon) Q/L loge((x+xdx)/(x-xdx))

= 1/(4pi epsilon) Q/L loge((1+dx)/(1-dx))

So there's no longer any x dependance?

I now doubt that the expression is right, even though it seems to be a standard result. Perhaps I've missed out the integration constant
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what you are doing here, what happened to a and why do you have dx?
 
Born2bwire said:
I don't understand what you are doing here, what happened to a and why do you have dx?

a = x dx. I could rewrite it as a = x b if it makes things clearer. After thinking about it further, the problem is that the charge density is now rho = Q/2a = Q/xdx and so I can no longer take it outside of the integral as a constant.
 
If rho is Q/2a then this means the charge density is constant. You need to integrate dq/r where r is the distance from x to the infinitesimal charge dq. dq = (Q/2a)dx' and r = x-x' so your variable of integration is x' not x.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top