Potential elastic energy problem in an incline

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum compression of a spring and the rebound distance of a package on an incline. The user applied the work-energy principle, incorporating the effects of kinetic friction and gravitational potential energy. For maximum spring compression, the calculated value was 3.69 m, while the rebound distance was determined to be 5.83 m. The user confirmed that their calculations were accurate after verification. The procedures used in both parts of the problem were deemed correct.
erik-the-red
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Question
A 20.0 kg package is released on a 50 ^\circ incline, 4.50 m from a long spring with force constant 150 N/m that is attached at the bottom of the incline. The block hits the spring, compresses the spring, and finally bounds back. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the package and the incline is \mu_k = .20. The mass of the spring is negligible

1. Calculate the maximum compression of the spring by the block.

2. How far does the block rebound back along the incline?

For the first part, I used work done by nonconservative force (W_nc) = E_f - E_i.

This translates into -f_k(d+x) = (1/2)(k)(x^2) - (mg)(d+x)(sin(\Theta)).
Plugging in known values, noting that x is the unknown results in: -(.20)(20.0)(9.80)(cos(50 ^\circ)(4.50 + x)=(1/2)(150)(x^2) - (20)(9.80)(4.50+x)(sin(50 ^\circ).

Evaluating, -25.2(4.5+x)=75x^2 - 150(4.5+x)
0=75x^2 - 124.8(4.5+x)
x_1 = 3.69 m.

Is this procedure correct?

2. K_1 + U_1 + W_n = K_2 + U_2
W_n=U_2 - U_1.
-25.2x = (20.0)(9.80)(xsin(50 ^\circ) - (1/2)(150)(3.69)^2
-25.2x=150x - 1021
1021=175.2x
x=5.83 m

Is this procedure correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Both seem fine to me!
 
Thanks!

I checked today and they were correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top