Potential Energy Based On Order Of Force Applications?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact of the order of force applications on an elevator's potential energy. Two scenarios are presented: one where the elevator first accelerates upwards and then decelerates, resulting in a net gain in height and potential energy, and another where the order is reversed, leading to a loss in height and potential energy. The key point is that despite identical total forces applied, the sequence affects the final potential energy of the elevator. This raises questions about the significance of force application order in energy calculations. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn is that the order of forces does indeed influence an object's total energy.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
An elevator cable pulls an elevator up with a force of (g+a)*m for t seconds where m is the mass of the elevator, accelerating it upwards. Then, for t seconds (just as many as the first time interval), it applies an upward force of (g-a)*m, decelerating it to a stop (the net force here is downwards because of g-a).

Let's put the potential energy reference point at the beginning of the situation. The elevator moved up. The elevator thus gained potential energy.

Now consider that the order had been reversed. First (g-a)*m then (g+a)*m, each for the same time intervals. The total force applied to the elevator would have been the same, yet the elevator would have lost potential energy in the latter case.

Is that correct? Did I do something wrong? It seems odd to me that two situations with identical force applications but differing orders of those applications would result in differing total energy for each case.

Note: this is not a homework question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe I should rephrase my scenarios:

Consider an elevator at height h. If that elevator's cable first applies a force of (g+a)*m for y meters, then applies a force of (g-a)*m for y meters, the elevator's height is h+2y meters.

Now consider that same elevator back at height h. This time though, the elevator is first applying a force of (g-a) * m for -y meters, then applying a force of (g+a)*m for -y meters, the elevator's height is h-2y

In the first case, the elevator accelerated up, then accelerated down, and gained height (at the time it accelerated down, it had a positive velocity and so the acceleration down stopped it)
In the second case, the elevator accelerated down, then accelerated up, and lost height. (at the time it accelerated up, it had a negative velocity and so the acceleration up stopped it)

First case elevator's final PE > Second case elevator's final PE

The only difference between the first case and the second case was the order in which the forces of the elevator cable were administered.

Force order therefore matters when it comes to potential energy. Do you agree with this, and if not, where did I go wrong?

Again, not a homework question. I created this problem to show that order in which forces are administered has an effect on an object's total energy.
 
Last edited:
Of course the order which you apply the forces on the body determines the direction in which the body moves, but you must agree that you case is equivalent to the case with no gravitational field, when the force is ±ma.
The potential energy here has no meaning, since the field is uniform, by definition it is infinite, so the fact that you choose some surface in that infinite uniform field, and say all objects must stop there, has no physical or mathematical meaning (the distance from this chosen surface).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top