Potential energy for a dipole between 2 infinitely large charged sheets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential energy, torque, and net force on a dipole placed between two infinitely large charged sheets. The dipole, consisting of charges +/- e spaced 220 nm apart, is subjected to sheets with equal but opposite charge densities of 125 µC/m². The maximum potential energy is determined using the formula U = -pEcos(φ), where the dipole should be oriented with its negative charge facing the negatively charged sheet for maximum energy. Concerns are raised about the calculation of the electric field between the sheets, with suggestions to apply Gauss's law for accurate results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly determining the electric field to solve the problem effectively.
Emethyst
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A dipole consisting of charges +/- e 220 nm apart is placed between two very large (essentially infinite) sheets carrying equal but opposite charge densities of 125 uC/m^2.

a) What is the maximum potential energy this dipole can have due to the sheets, and how should it be oriented relative to the sheets to attain this value?

b) What is the maximum torque the sheets can exert on the dipole, and how should it be oriented relative to the sheets to attain this value?

c) What net force do the two sheets exert on the dipole?


Homework Equations


U = -pEcos(\phi)
p = qd
E = \lambda/2\pi\epsilonx
where \lambda is the linear charge density, \epsilon is the permittivity of free space, and x is a distance for a point P from the sheet.
\sigma = q/A (surface charge density)


The Attempt at a Solution


I can see from the start that once I acquire a) the rest of the question should go smoothly. Where I am stuck is trying to calculate the initial electric field between the infinite sheets that the dipole lies in. What I tried to do was first find the linear charge density from the given surface density, arriving at a value of 11.2 uC/m by simply taking the square root of the 125 uC/m^2.

Next I treated each sheet as essentially lying where the point charges of the dipole lie (aka giving a distance of 220 nm between each sheet). With the distance found I then plugged this along with all other needed values into the electric field equation provided (the equation for the electric field strength for a point P a distance x away from an infinitely large sheet I found in my textbook).

From there I then multiplied this value by the dipole moment to arrive at an answer of 3.22 x 10^-14 J for the potential energy. I already know for maximum potential energy the dipole should be oriented so that its negative charge faces the negatively charged sheet (dipole moment should be in the opposite direction of the electric field, giving an angle of 180 to make cos\phi = -1 and thus cancel out the negative from the potential energy equation). My concern is that I think I am making too many assumptions (ex. about the distance between the two sheets) and am ultimately calculating the external electric field wrong. If someone could tell me if I am right or wrong, and if wrong point me in the right direction it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are calculating the electric field between the two sheets wrong? What is that equation E = \lambda / 2 \pi \epsilon x ? That's not the equation for the electric field between infinite parallel sheets.

You can find the electric field due to an infinite charged sheet by using the Gauss law. Then you can find the electric field between two of them by adding the components of the electric field made by each one of the sheets.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top