Folks,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The total potential energy functional for an isolated finite element timoshenko beam is given as

## \displaystyle \Pi_e(w, \Psi)=\int_{x_e}^{x_{e+1}} \left[ \frac{EI}{2} \left (\frac{d \Psi}{dx}\right )^2 + \frac{ G A K_s}{2} \left ( \frac {dw}{dx} + \Psi \right )^2 +...\right]dx +....##

Where the first term in the integral is the bending energy of the element. The author states that a constant state of ##\Psi(x)## is not admissible because the bending energy of the element would be zero leading to the numerical problem of shear locking.

Not sure I understand this concept. It is just a term that will go to 0 on the first derivative but the rest of the integral can still be evaluated. Why is it not admissible?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Potential Energy Functional - Timoshenko Shear Locking

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Potential Energy Functional | Date |
---|---|

How much energy can be generated by a swinging pendulum 60 kg | Oct 27, 2015 |

Potential Energy Stored in Hydrostatic Test Unit | Jul 2, 2014 |

Potential Energy in a Vessel | Feb 20, 2013 |

Converting potential energy to force | Jan 21, 2009 |

Gravitational potential energy storage - seeking comments | Apr 20, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**