Potential Energy in 3D: Partial Derivatives

AI Thread Summary
To find potential energy in three dimensions, partial derivatives are used instead of total derivatives because they allow for the analysis of how potential energy changes with respect to each coordinate independently. This approach is essential for deriving the associated vector field, such as gravitational acceleration, from the potential field. In a conservative vector field, one can assign a zero potential at a specific point and use a path integral to determine potential energy across different positions. Total derivatives would require a specific path or tangent, which complicates the analysis in multi-variable contexts. Thus, partial derivatives provide a clearer method for understanding the relationship between potential energy and spatial variables.
Gurasees
Messages
50
Reaction score
1
To find potential energy in 3 dimensions why do we take partial derivative and not total derivative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which formula do you mean?
 
  • Like
Likes Gurasees and Chestermiller
Derivatives of what?
 
Gurasees said:
To find potential energy in 3 dimensions why do we take partial derivative and not total derivative?
Guessing at the context...

If you have the potential field (e.g. gravitational potential per unit mass as a function of position), you can take three partial derivatives to arrive at the associated vector field (e.g. gravitational acceleration as a function of position).

If you have the vector field (e.g. gravitational acceleration as a function of position) and an assurance that the field is conservative then you can arbitrarily assign a zero potential somewhere, and take a path integral along an arbitrarily chosen path to obtain the associated potential field (e.g. gravitational potential per unit mass as a function of position).

What would it mean to take the total derivative of a function of three variables? The only way I see to do it would be to choose a path (or at least a tangent to a path). Taking a partial derivative amounts to picking a tangent that is aligned with a chosen coordinate axis.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top