Potential Energy of Masses on a Pivot

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the gravitational potential energy of a system consisting of two masses attached to a pivoted rod. The potential energy function is derived as u(θ) = (m_2l_2 - m_1l_1)g_E sin(θ), and the derivative is set to zero to find equilibrium conditions, leading to the conclusion that m_2l_2 must equal m_1l_1. However, the participants express confusion about determining the angle of minimum potential energy, as setting the derivative to zero does not yield a specific angle. The conversation emphasizes the intuitive understanding of how the rod stabilizes when one mass is heavier than the other. Overall, the discussion highlights the relationship between mass distribution and potential energy in pivot systems.
adkinje
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
A straight rod of negligable mass is mounted on a frictionless pivot (see attached diagram)Blocks having masses m_1,m_2 are attched to the rod at distances l_1,l_2. (a) Write an expression for teh gravitational potential energy of the blocks-Earth system as a function of the angle \theta made with the horizontal. (b) Find the angle of minimum potential energy. (c) Show that if m_2l_2=m_1l_2 then the system is in equilibrium regardless of the angle \theta

I find that the potential energy function is:

u(\theta)=(m_2l_2-m_1l_1)g_E\sin(\theta)

\frac{du}{d\theta}=(m_2l_2-m_1l_1)g_E\cos(\theta)

Setting the derivative equal to zero gives m_2l_2=m1_l_1.


This seems to address part c. Setting this equal to zero doesn't give an angle (part b). How do I solve part (b)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I almost forgot the diagram. Attached.
 

Attachments

  • physics diagram.jpg
    physics diagram.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 673
Use your intuition. If you hold a rod by the middle and attach a mass on one side, at what angle does the rod come to rest?
 
adkinje said:
Setting the derivative equal to zero gives m_2l_2=m1_l_1.

And what happens to your potential energy if this condition is satisfied?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top