Potential Function of a Conservative Force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the potential function associated with a given conservative force represented by the vector field F = y²(i) + 2xy(j). Participants are exploring the relationship between the force and the potential function in the context of vector calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to integrate the components of the force to find the potential function but expresses uncertainty about treating variables as constants during integration. Some participants suggest clarifying the distinction between vector and scalar functions and emphasize the need for the potential function to satisfy specific conditions related to the force components.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing guidance on how to approach the integration and the formulation of the potential function. There is a recognition of the need to ensure that the potential function is scalar and aligns with the conditions derived from the force components.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the requirement to treat variables appropriately during integration, and the discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between the potential function and the force field components.

bmb2009
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a conservative force with the Force given as F=y^2(i)+2xy(j), what is the potential function related to it.

Homework Equations



-dU/dx = F

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I have to integrate the components but I don't know how... since the (i) direction was differentiated with respect to x would I just treat the y as constant and say F=xy^2(i)+xy^2(j) + c ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track, but remember that the potential is a scalar function. You've written down a result that is a vector and for some reason called it F. It might help to explicitly write down the components of F in terms of the partial derivatives of U.
 
So would it just be U(x,y)=xy^2 + xy^2 = 2xy^2 + c because it's a scalar?
 
bmb2009 said:
So would it just be U(x,y)=xy^2 + xy^2 = 2xy^2 + c because it's a scalar?

Close, but no. Remember, you are looking for a scalar function ##U(x,y)## such that ##\nabla U = \vec F##. So you need ##U_x = y^2## and ##U_y = 2xy##. Start by taking the anti-partial derivative of the first one with respect to ##x## by holding ##y## constant, as you asked in your original post. Don't forget when you do that your "constant" of integration will be a function of ##y##. Them make the second equation work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K