Potential In parallal combination of resistors

Thread starter Shayan shan
Start date Mar 9, 2017
Tags

Combination Potential Resistors

Mar 9, 2017

Shayan shan

Why is the Potential Difference equal in parallel combination of resistances ?

Physics news on Phys.org

Scientist returns to microbial roots and discovers potential quantum computing advancement
Physicists achieve record precision in measuring proton-to-electron mass ratio with H₂⁺
Quantum calculations provide a sharper image of subatomic stress

Mar 9, 2017

phinds

Science Advisor

Insights Author

Gold Member

2024 Award

Shayan shan said:

Why is the Potential Difference equal in parallel combination of resistances ?

Why do you think it is? Can you draw a diagram showing parallel resistors and indicate the potential difference across each resistor?

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...

View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario

View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

View full post »