Potential inside (and outside) a charged spherical shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential inside and outside a uniformly charged spherical shell using a specified integral. The potential outside the shell is derived as V(x) = Q/(4πε₀x), while the potential inside the shell is V(r) = Q/(4πε₀R). The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying the surface charge density and integrating over the appropriate variables. The user initially struggled with the integration process but ultimately resolved the issue by considering the different cases for the potential based on the position relative to the shell. The conversation concludes with a confirmation of the solution and acknowledgment of the assistance provided.
russdot
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
[solved] Potential inside (and outside) a charged spherical shell

Homework Statement


Use the integral (i) to determine the potential V(x) both inside and outside a uniformly charge spherical surface, with total charge Q and radius R.


Homework Equations


(i) V(\vec{x}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int\frac{\rho(\vec{x'})d^{3}x'}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x'}|}
\rho(\vec{x'}) = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^{2}}


The Attempt at a Solution


if the x vector is along the z axis (can exploit spherical symmetry), then |x-x'| = \sqrt{x^{2} + R^{2} - 2xRcos\theta}. (using cosine law)
Then
V(\vec{x}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{Q}{2}\int_{0}^{\pi}\frac{sin\theta d\theta}{\sqrt{x^{2} + R^{2} - 2xRcos\theta}}

V(x) = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}x}
or
V(r) = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r}
Which is correct for outside the spherical shell, but I can't figure out how |x - x'| would be any different (or what else should be different) for inside the spherical shell to get
V(r) = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}R}

I realize there are better/easier ways of doing this, but the question says to use that integral specifically...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't you have:

V(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{Q}{2} \int_0^{x} \int_{0}^{\pi }\frac{sin \theta ' dx' d \theta '}{\sqrt{(x')^{2} + R^{2} - 2(x')Rcos \theta '}}

I understand that the integration over \phi ' gave you 2 \pi , but what happened to the integration over x'?
 
Well d^{3}x' turns into r^{2}sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi and since r is constant at R (spherical shell) then an R^2 comes out of the integral and cancels the R^2 in the denominator from the charge density rho = Q / (4 pi R^2).

I also figured out the problem, after integration:
V(x) = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{1}{2xR} [\sqrt{(R + x)^{2}} - \sqrt{(R - x)^{2}}]
and I forgot to consider the different cases for \sqrt{(R - x)^{2}} when x > R (outside spherical shell) and x<R (inside).
 
Last edited:
Since your dealing with a surface charge, and not a volume charge, you should have:

V(\vec{x})=\int \frac{\sigma (\vec{r&#039;}) d^2 x&#039;}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x&#039;}|}

where \sigma (\vec{r&#039;})= Q/4 \pi R^2 is the surface charge density.
 
Yes, you're right. The form I used was ambiguous, sorry about that!
I guess I just jumped right to using R^{2}sin\theta&#039; d\theta&#039; d\phi as the surface area element.
I have solved the problem though, thanks for the assistance!
 
No problem, but I wasn't much assistance:smile:
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top