Potential inside NON-Conducting hollow spherical shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the constants a and b in the potential equation for a non-conducting hollow spherical shell with a surface charge density. The potential inside the shell is given as V_(x,y,z) = (V0/R^2)(6z^2 + ax^2 + by^2), with the assumption of rotational symmetry around the z-axis. The Laplacian of the potential relates to the charge density, leading to the boundary condition ∇²V = -σ/ε on the shell's surface. By applying spherical coordinates and recognizing that the potential must be axially symmetric, it is concluded that a and b must be equal and correspond to the Legendre polynomial P_2(cosθ). Ultimately, it is determined that both constants a and b equal -3.
dikmikkel
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,
Suppose we have a spherical shell with charge density on the surface \sigma and radius R. The potential inside the shell is given by:

V_(x,y,z) = \frac{V0}{R^{2}}(6z^2+ax^2+by^2)
It is assumed, that the potential is rotational symmetric around the z-axis inside and outside the shell, and goes to 0 far away from the shell. There's no charge inside and outside the shell and no outer field.

How do i determine the constants a and b?

Mabye change to spherical coordinates and solve the equation:
\frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{\theta}}=0
for a or b. But i can't figure out any other conditions if this is right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laplacian of the voltage is related to the charge. So your boundary conditions would be:

\nabla^2 V = -\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon}

On the surface of the shell. So for ease of analysis you would want to do this in spherical coordinates.
 
I can't really see that this is a boundary condition? And would solving possions equation on the surface help me determine a and b, i can't really follow?
 
Aah sorry I am really tired now. I take the laplacian, and this would relate it all, beautiful, Thanks. Just so used to try finding the potential :)
And sorry for the language. I'm from Denmark.
 
If the pot inside is axially symjmetric, and b must be equal.
Since DEl^2 V=0 inside, the angular distribution must be a Legendre polynomial.
Since the power of x,y,and z is 2, it must be
P_2(\cos\theta)=(3\cos^2\theta-1)/2.
This means a=b=-3.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's gold thank you.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top