Calculating the Potential of Tidal Force: A Mathematical Explanation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical relationship between tidal forces and potential energy, specifically how to derive the potential from the force using calculus. Participants express confusion about the process of obtaining the force as the negative gradient of the potential, questioning the assumptions behind this relationship and the conditions for a force to be conservative. Clarification is sought on the steps involved in calculating the gradient and confirming whether the force's curl is zero, indicating it can be expressed as a gradient. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding basic calculus principles to navigate these concepts effectively. Overall, the thread highlights the need for a solid grasp of calculus to address questions about tidal force and potential energy.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Given the tidal force
$$
-\alpha\left(\frac{\hat{\mathbf{d}}}{d^2}-\frac{\hat{\mathbf{d}}_0}{d_0^2}\right)
$$
How is the potential of the tidal force
$$
-\alpha\left(\frac{1}{d}+\frac{x}{d_0^2}\right)
$$
where ##-\nabla U_{tide} = \mathbf{F}_{tide}##.

Idon't see how we get the force by taking the negative of the gradient of U.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The getting of a force by taking the negative gradient of a potential is the definition of the potential, we can't express any force this way but when we can we can by assumption and by definition. If you can take the gradient of some potential and get a specific force then that is a fact of the calculus and an observation about the specific force (that it is a conservative force). If you cannot (testable by seeing if the force has non-zero curl) then that is another possibility.

In general you take a given expression for a force, test for whether it is conservative (= curl free = can be expressed as a gradient) and if so you integrate the gradient relationship to find the potential the same as you integrate any derivative/differential equations. I'm not clear what you question actually is. Are you unclear as to the calculus steps? or unclear as to the physics of why its possible? i think I addressed the latter. If your assignment was to "do the math" then follow those instructions. If you are asking for math help then follow the guidelines (see link in my signature) and show what you've done so far and where you're getting stuck.
 
I don't see how they arrived to that result mathematically.
 
How do we even show the curl is zero?

##\hat{\mathbf{d}} =\langle \hat{\mathbf{x}},\hat{\mathbf{y}}, \hat{\mathbf{z}}\rangle## and ##\hat{\mathbf{d}}_0 =\langle \hat{\mathbf{x}}_0, \hat{\mathbf{y}}_0, \hat{\mathbf{z}}_0\rangle##

so ##d^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2## and ##d_0^2 = x_0^2 + y_0^2 + z_0^2##
 
Dustinsfl said:
I don't see how they arrived to that result mathematically.

I'm not clear on which "result". How they took the gradient to confirm the potential functions gradient is the force in question? Or how to start with the force and find the potential to which it is a gradient?

I can explain either or both but not if you aren't up to speed on the basic calculus. The gradient is the gradient. You should know how to calculate it. The reverse process is a matter of starting with one component and integrating with respect to one variable treating others as constants. When you get a solution you have a "constant" of integration which may depend on the remaining variables. you repeat this for each variable in turn until you have the full potential. (That's an overview and I'd be happy to work through an example.)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top