Pound-Rebka Experiment: Understanding Gamma Ray Detection & Doppler Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Im trying to understand the pound- rebka test , so was the gamma ray detector moving
, when the photon gets shot from the top of the 4th floor of the science building at harvard
to the bottom it will be blue shifted , so would they want to move the detector away at a certain speed so the doppler effect will cancel out the blueshift , and the speed that the detector is moving then using the doppler effect equation we could calculate the shift.
Any input will be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I think you're on the right track although it's hard to follow what you've written. This Wiki entry might explain ( if you have not seen it already ). The experimenters certainly moved the receiver to offset the gravitational frequency shift with a Doppler shift.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound–Rebka_experiment
 
cragar said:
Im trying to understand the pound- rebka test , so was the gamma ray detector moving
, when the photon gets shot from the top of the 4th floor of the science building at harvard
to the bottom it will be blue shifted , so would they want to move the detector away at a certain speed so the doppler effect will cancel out the blueshift , and the speed that the detector is moving then using the doppler effect equation we could calculate the shift.
Any input will be much appreciated.

The reason is that once you move the detector at the right speed, the experimenters managed to cancel out the gravitational blueshift through the relativistic Doppler redshift. The idea was that the Doppler redshift was used as an easy to measure effect (through measuring the elevator speed "v").
 
ok so the detector was moving towards the Earth in an elevator with a speed V .
And i am just wondering could we use the zee man effect to measure the shift ,
could we use an atom that had a specific wavelength of a photon between the ground state and some other state , that could be absorbed from the emitter but could not be absorbed at the detector because of the red shift , but if we placed the atom's in a magnetic field at the detector and had the strength of the B field tuned precisely to accept the shifted photon , would this work.
 
cragar said:
ok so the detector was moving towards the Earth in an elevator with a speed V .
And i am just wondering could we use the zee man effect to measure the shift ,
could we use an atom that had a specific wavelength of a photon between the ground state and some other state , that could be absorbed from the emitter but could not be absorbed at the detector because of the red shift , but if we placed the atom's in a magnetic field at the detector and had the strength of the B field tuned precisely to accept the shifted photon , would this work.

yes, should work
 
sweet thanks for your response .
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top