Power control of Class D Rf AMP

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a Class D low power RF amplifier that can control output power without altering the input digital coded pulse train. Participants explore the challenges of achieving approximately 200mW output at 50 MHz while maintaining efficiency and addressing the limitations of Class D amplifiers in RF applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the need for a Class D amplifier to achieve high efficiency and battery life while controlling the RF output power without modifying the input signal.
  • Another participant explains that Class D amplifiers use pulse width modulation (PWM) and questions the feasibility of using such a method at 50 MHz due to potential efficiency losses.
  • Some participants argue that Class D amplifiers are not typically used at RF frequencies, suggesting alternatives like Class C for continuous wave (CW) signals.
  • A participant expresses the desire to avoid PWM due to its potential to complicate the existing digitally modulated data stream.
  • There is a suggestion to explore other RF amplifier topologies that minimize quiescent power waste, with a focus on efficiency.
  • Several participants express confusion regarding the nature of the signal being amplified, with discussions about whether it is CW, amplitude shift keying (ASK), or frequency shift keying (FSK).
  • Participants discuss the implications of different amplifier classes (A, B, C, D) on efficiency and distortion, particularly in relation to the modulation scheme used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the appropriate amplifier class or topology to use for the RF signal amplification. There are competing views on the nature of the signal and the implications for amplifier efficiency, with ongoing uncertainty about the specifics of the modulation scheme.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in understanding the exact nature of the RF signal and its modulation, which affects the discussion on suitable amplifier classes. There are unresolved questions about the efficiency of various amplifier topologies in relation to the specific requirements of the application.

  • #31
Okay, so why do the architects of the system I'm suffering with use the term class D?
There is a fixed 50 MHz source that is being turned on and off (OOK) at the data rate. I have seen the schematic on a white board. Its two or four fets in series on a die whose power supply is controlled by the programmable switcher I told you about... I've heard the term Class D power osc flung around as well...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Probably because they started with a square wave generator which technically would be class D and filtered the hell out of it. Class C is closely related to class D but C is made to run at a resonant frequency. There is a parallel tank circuit in place of the collector resistor. I have no idea why they would run all the way out to the last amplifier stage with a square wave. Good engineering practice would be to filter as soon as possible in the signal chain. I guess I wouldn't be too surprised if what you have is actually class C but for whatever reason is mis-named.
 
  • #33
So you have a On-Off-Keyed 50MHz signal switched on and off at 1MHz and you want a adjustable gain amplifier that is as efficient as possible to step up the power?

A fixed gain amplifier won't work for you because you have found it necessary to vary the output of your current amplifier by adjusting its power supply voltage, correct?

I'm looking at the diagram for the Class C amplifier on wikipedia. Would varying the value of the collector resistor change the gain of that circuit?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
901