1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Power from two sources, electrically assisted bicycle

Tags:
  1. Mar 31, 2016 #1
    So I'm just doing a project where i have a electrically assisted bicycle and im struggling working out the power when the bike is going uphill.

    If i have a certain force provided by the rider, and a force provided by an electrical motor; can I do [tex]Power=F_{motor}* v_{motor}+F_{rider}*v_{rider}[/tex]

    where the [itex]v_{motor}[/itex] and [itex]v_{rider}[/itex] are the speeds that the given force will generate, or would it be [tex]P=F_{total}*v_{total}.[/tex]

    sorry if this is a basic question I've just been struggling and needed some reassurance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 31, 2016 #2

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Both ! Does that offer some reassurance ?

    There is a small snag: because of wind resistance, power is not a linear function of ##v## (the force to go twice as fast (##2v##) is more than twice the force for ##v##).
    So if you on your own go 15 km/h and the motor would give you 10 km/h, the two of you together won't achieve 25 km/h, but for example 20 km/h. But the relative contributions would still be 15/25 (60%) from you and 10/25 (40%) from the motor.
     
  4. Mar 31, 2016 #3
    Oh that does, I didn't think of it like that!

    So if we are travelling at a set speed (constant) say 40kmph for both the motor + rider contributions it would be better to work the power out using the second method i mentioned by working out the sum of the forces acting on the bike?
     
  5. Mar 31, 2016 #4

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Yes. The ##v_{\rm rider}## and ##v_{\rm motor}## aren't very meaningful. ##F_{\rm total} = F_{\rm rider} + F_{\rm motor}## is much more sensible.
     
  6. Mar 31, 2016 #5

    jbriggs444

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Well, it might be more sensible if one had a definition for the three terms in that formula. No such definition is evident for any of the terms here.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2016
  7. Mar 31, 2016 #6

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I plead guilty to the well-meant reproach in post #5. ##F_{\rm total}## is easily defined: the force needed to maintain the speed ##v##. It can be measured, e.g. with a spring balance. And then the other two have to be loosely defined as the (average) fractions times ##F_{\rm total}##. Perhaps ##F_{\rm motor}## can be recovered from the specifications.... (or from the time it takes the battery to go empty, an efficiency, etc. etc.). Even exact is relative :smile: .
     
  8. Mar 31, 2016 #7

    jbriggs444

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I'll buy that. Though this model has limitations. It seems to assume that one has a single-speed bicycle, a constant torque motor and a rider who will exert a constant average force on the pedals throughout a relevant range of speeds.
     
  9. Mar 31, 2016 #8

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I don't see how it makes such assumptions. I only see force, not torque or rpm, so the drivetrain issues just seem to not be addressed. It might just be that the OP hasn't gotten that far yet.

    If I were designing a motor assisted bike, I might put the motor on the input side of the drive so it can take advantage of the gears along with the rider.
     
  10. Mar 31, 2016 #9

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Matt, I've seen what other threads you initiated and I'm wondering about this project. I would almost think one of your kids hijacked your account, but there must be a better explanation ?
     
  11. Mar 31, 2016 #10
    I do have equations for those terms, I was just curious which way was best to approach given my situation where I'm trying to stay at a constant cycle speed.


    Thankyou, it works out better this way!

    Yeah I haven't got that far yet, i've just been roughing out some physics first thanks for the suggestion.





    Matt:
    Yes my friend borrowed my account, they wanted to ask for a second opinion. Maybe i didn't explain it well enough thanks all! I need to up my skills as a tutor haha
     
  12. Mar 31, 2016 #11

    jbriggs444

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    You cannot add force determined by a spring scale attached to a bike at one speed and force determined by a spring scale attached to a bike at another speed and get a number that is meaningful for the purpose at hand if the speeds are different without such an assumption.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Power from two sources, electrically assisted bicycle
Loading...