Power of Complex numbers proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality involving complex numbers: \(\left( {\frac{{1 + \cos x + i\sin x}}{{1 + \cos x - i\sin x}}} \right)^n = \cos nx + i\sin nx\). The problem is situated within the context of complex analysis and trigonometric identities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the representation of the numerator and denominator in terms of exponential functions, suggesting that they can be expressed as \(1 + e^{ix}\) and \(1 + e^{-ix}\). There are attempts to manipulate the expression using properties of complex conjugates and magnitudes. Some participants question the correctness of the exponent used in the transformation of the expression.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various insights and corrections regarding the manipulation of the complex expression. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of exponential forms and the handling of conjugates, but there is no clear consensus on the approach to take or the correctness of certain steps.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the manipulation of exponents and the definitions of terms involved in the proof. Participants are also addressing potential errors in previous attempts without resolving the overall proof.

libelec
Messages
173
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that [tex]\left( {\frac{{1 + \cos x + i\sin x}}{{1 + \cos x - i\sin x}}} \right)^n} = \cos nx + i\sin nx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it would be a good idea calling z = 1 + cos x + i*sen x, because then 1 + cos x - i*sen x would be [tex]\bar{z}[/tex], and then I would have something of the form [tex]{\left( {\frac{z}{{\bar z}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {\frac{{{z^2}}}{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}}}} \right)^n}[/tex]. If I use the Euler form for complex numbers, being [tex]\varphi[/tex] the argument of z, then z[tex]\left| z \right|{e^{i\phi }}[/tex].

So [tex]{\left( {\frac{{{z^2}}}{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {\frac{{{{(\left| z \right|{e^{i\phi }})}^2}}}{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {\frac{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}{e^{i2\phi }}}}{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {{e^{i2\phi }}} \right)^n} = {e^{i2n\phi }}\[/tex]. Which would all work just fine with the proof if I could somehow prove that [tex]\varphi[/tex] = x/2.

My question is, is this OK? And if it is OK, how can I prove that [tex]\varphi[/tex] = x/2?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aren't the numerator and denominator equal to 1 + eix and 1 + e-ix respectively? That's the direction I would go. And the right side is ei*nx = (ei x)n = (cos x + i sin x)n,

One comment about your work: You have the exponent wrong on the right side. Your equation should be as follows:
[tex]{\left( {\frac{z}{{\bar z}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {\frac{{{z^2}}}{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}}}} \right)^{n/2}}[/tex]
 
Mark44 said:
One comment about your work: You have the exponent wrong on the right side. Your equation should be as follows:
[tex]{\left( {\frac{z}{{\bar z}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {\frac{{{z^2}}}{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}}}} \right)^{n/2}}[/tex]
That doesn't look right...
 
Mark44 said:
Aren't the numerator and denominator equal to 1 + eix and 1 + e-ix respectively? That's the direction I would go. And the right side is ei*nx = (ei x)n = (cos x + i sin x)n,

Yes, that's basically what I did. Only that I recalled the whole numerator z so that I could deal with the division.

Mark44 said:
One comment about your work: You have the exponent wrong on the right side. Your equation should be as follows:

No, why? [tex]\frac{z}{{\bar z}} = \frac{{{z^2}}}{{{{\left| z \right|}^2}}}[/tex]
 
Mark44 said:
Aren't the numerator and denominator equal to 1 + eix and 1 + e-ix respectively? That's the direction I would go. And the right side is ei*nx = (ei x)n = (cos x + i sin x)n,

One comment about your work: You have the exponent wrong on the right side. Your equation should be as follows:
[tex]{\left( {\frac{z}{{\bar z}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {\frac{{{z^2}}}{{{{}^2}}}} \right)^{n/2}}[/tex]

Hurkyl said:
That doesn't look right...

It is not right. Try, e.g., n=2 for z=(cos x + i sin x)n and we have

(cos x + i sin x)2= [tex](cos^2x-sin^2x) + i(2cosxsinx)[/tex], but
[tex]\left| z \right|^2 = \left| cos x + isinx \right|^2=1[/tex]
 
Hurkyl said:
That doesn't look right...

[quote Originally posted by Mark44]
One comment about your work: You have the exponent wrong on the right side. Your equation should be as follows:
[tex]{\left( {\frac{z}{{\bar z}}} \right)^n} = {\left( {\frac{{{z^2}}}{{{{|z|}^2}}}} \right)^{n/2}}[/tex]
[/quote]
I agree. I didn't notice that the conjugate in the denominator on the left had changed to the square of the magnitude in the expression on the right.
 
Back to the original problem...
[tex]Prove~that~\left( {\frac{{1 + \cos x + i\sin x}}{{1 + \cos x - i\sin x}}} \right)^n} = \cos nx + i\sin nx[/tex]

[tex]\left( {\frac{{1 + \cos x + i\sin x}}{{1 + \cos x - i\sin x}}} \right)^n} = \left(\frac{1 + e^{ix}}{1 + e^{-ix}}\right)^n[/tex]

Inside the parentheses, multiply numerator and denominator by eix. Then factor eix out of the two terms in the numerator and cancel the factor that is common to numerator and denominator. It's then easy to show that what you have left equals cos(nx) + isin(nx) = einx = (eix)n.
 
EDIT: I hadn't seen that comment from Mark44.

Thanks, I wouldn't have thought that.
 
Last edited:
Edit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K