Power required from forced induction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter James125
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the power required for forced induction using a specific equation, but the user reports obtaining unexpectedly low results around 0.4W. They initially overlooked a factor of 2 related to a four-stroke engine, yet still find their results significantly lower than expected. There is a request for sources related to the equation used in the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate parameters and factors in such calculations. Overall, the user seeks clarification and assistance to resolve the discrepancies in their power calculations.
James125
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to calculate the power required from forced induction with this equation;

W˙=m˙CpT1ηc⎡⎣(P2P1)(γ−1γ)−1⎤⎦

However I seem to be getting rather low results for work ~0.8W I have done my calculations in this spreadsheet. Any ideas where I've went wrong?

thanks

Note the file is .xls not .xlsx I had to change it to upload
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
File doesn't open for me. Please try to repost. Others have posted .xlsx files before.
 
You can open the original file if you change the extension manually. Never to worry I have worked out how to save as xlsx. Missed out a factor of 2 first time round (forgot about it being 4 stroke). I still seem to be a factor of 1000 or so out. I have ~0.4w
 

Attachments

Do you have a source for the equation in the OP?
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...

Similar threads

Back
Top