Power required from forced induction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter James125
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the power required for forced induction using a specific equation, but the user reports obtaining unexpectedly low results around 0.4W. They initially overlooked a factor of 2 related to a four-stroke engine, yet still find their results significantly lower than expected. There is a request for sources related to the equation used in the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate parameters and factors in such calculations. Overall, the user seeks clarification and assistance to resolve the discrepancies in their power calculations.
James125
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to calculate the power required from forced induction with this equation;

W˙=m˙CpT1ηc⎡⎣(P2P1)(γ−1γ)−1⎤⎦

However I seem to be getting rather low results for work ~0.8W I have done my calculations in this spreadsheet. Any ideas where I've went wrong?

thanks

Note the file is .xls not .xlsx I had to change it to upload
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
File doesn't open for me. Please try to repost. Others have posted .xlsx files before.
 
You can open the original file if you change the extension manually. Never to worry I have worked out how to save as xlsx. Missed out a factor of 2 first time round (forgot about it being 4 stroke). I still seem to be a factor of 1000 or so out. I have ~0.4w
 

Attachments

Do you have a source for the equation in the OP?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top