Power Series Solution to a Diff EQ

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
[SOLVED] !Power Series Solution to a Diff EQ!

Homework Statement


Find the first 5 term of a Power series solution of

y'+2xy=0 (1)

Missed this class, so please bear with my attempt here.

The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming that y takes the form

y=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nx^n

Then (1) can be written:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}nc_nx^{n-1}+2x\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nx^n=0

Re-written 'in phase' and with the same indices (in terms of k):

c_1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(k+1)c_{k+1}x^k+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}2c_{k-1}x^k=0

\Rightarrow c_1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}[(k+1)c_{k+1}+2c_{k-1}]x^k=0

Now invoking the identity property, I can say that all coefficients of powers of x are equal to zero (including c_1*x^0)

So I can write:

c_1=0 and

c_{k+1}=-\frac{2c_{k-1}}{k+1}Now I am stuck (I know I am almost there though!)

Should I just start plugging in numbers for k=1,2,3,4,5 ? Will this generate enough 'recursiveness' to solve for the 1st five terms?

Is that the correct approach?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry guys, I got it. And for those who might make future use of this thread, my approach was correct. Solving

<br /> c_{k+1}=-\frac{2c_{k-1}}{k+1}

For k=1,2...,9 generates enough coefficients to write out the first five nonzero terms of the solution by plugging them back into

<br /> y=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}c_nx^n
 
Last edited:
I think you need one more initial condition on your series (example y(0)=x_0). You need to define c_0 (or you can just leave c_0 as the 'integration' constant of the ODE). However, the recursion formula becomes pretty obvious once you have that. If you can't see it right away, try plugging in a few values. Since c_1=0 what can we say about all the odd labelled coefficients? You should get something that looks like the series of an exponential function. In fact, the series will have a closed form solution if you can see how your answer relates to the exponential series.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top