Pre-Lab Question: Identifying Acid with No Reaction to 8 Reactants

  • Thread starter Thread starter ldixon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around identifying a colorless, odorless acid with a very low pH that shows no reaction with eight specific reactants. Participants explore the possibility of an acid that remains unreactive with KOH, AgNO3, BaCl2, NaCl, NH3(aq), Ba(OH)2, H2SO4, and Cu(NO3)2. Suggestions include considering weak acids or those that do not participate in typical reactions with the given reagents. The challenge lies in the assumption that all acids should react with at least one of the reactants, prompting inquiries into specific examples of acids and their reactivity. Ultimately, the discussion seeks to clarify the characteristics of such an unreactive acid.
ldixon
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have a question on a pre-lab that I have to do. The question is:

You determine that test tube number 3 is an acid. It is colorless, odorless and has a very low pH value. You test the sample with all eight(8) reactants available and find no reaction(NR). What is the acid? Explain your answer.

The 8 reactants in the lab are:

KOH
AgNO3
BaCl2
NaCl
NH3(aq)
Ba(OH)2
H2SO4
Cu(NO3)2

I could not figure this out, it seems to me that every acid would react with at leat one of these? Is there an acid that would have no reaction with all of these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what are some of the acids you have considered, and what do those acids react with?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top