Predict Satellite Sighting: A Space Engineer's Guide

AI Thread Summary
To predict satellite sightings from a specific latitude and longitude, one must consider the satellite's altitude, inclination angle, and the Earth's rotation. Drawing a diagram helps visualize the satellite's orbit relative to the observer's position on Earth. By calculating the angle between the satellite's position and the horizon, one can determine when the satellite will be visible. The time the satellite is visible can be estimated based on its orbit and the observer's location. Further calculations may require knowledge of spherical trigonometry for more precise predictions.
jstrz13phys
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am completely lost. I am taking a course in Space Engineering. I have been asked to predict (without a program/software) when I will be able to see a satelite from a given lat, long from earth. I know the altitude is 350KM and I also know the inclination angle to the equator. It is in a circular orbit so I know what the average speed is. What I don't know is where to go next. Everytime I start I get lost - how do I handle spinnig earth, the woble the Earth has from moon, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First law of physics, if in doubt - draw a picture!
Assume you are on the equator (just for starters) draw the circle surface of the Earth and then a parralel circle orbit 350km away.
Draw a straight line at a tangent to where you are standing on the earth, this is the horizon, you can see the satelite once it is above this line.
Knowing the radius of the Earth and drawing a couple of triangles should give you the angle betwen the satelite rising and setting, since there are 24 hours in a full circle this gives you length of time you can see it from where you are standing.
Obviosuly with no other data you can only give a relative answer in terms of X mins before and after it is overhead.

Beyond that you are going to have to hit the dreaded spherical trig books !
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
6K
Replies
126
Views
6K
Back
Top