Predicting the Shape of Complicated Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_dialogue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Shape
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around curve sketching in multivariable calculus, specifically focusing on predicting the shape of complicated functions such as e^{-x^2} and sin(x^2). Participants explore methods for quickly visualizing these functions without detailed curve sketching techniques typically learned in single-variable calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the characteristics of functions like e^{-x^2} and sin(x^2), questioning how to determine their shapes quickly. There is a focus on understanding properties such as concavity and curvature without resorting to derivatives.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on the behavior of the functions and questioning each other's interpretations. Some guidance on identifying properties of the functions has been offered, but there is no clear consensus on the best approach to sketching these graphs quickly.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the properties of the functions and the effectiveness of their descriptions. There is a mention of differing interpretations of what it means for a function to "look like" another, indicating a lack of clarity in definitions and assumptions being made.

the_dialogue
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question-- it is a general question about curve sketching in multivariable calculus.

In order to draw graphs in 3D, we use level sets, then-- if the level sets are something "nice" like circles or parallel lines-- we take a cross section when y=0 and then transform the cross section on to the level sets.

However, it is at the stage of the cross sections where I begin to be confused. We are given a function such as [tex]e^{-x^2}[/tex]. I do not already know what this function looks like.
What is a quick way to draw this graph (or any other) without going through the whole curve sketching process (learned in single variable calculus)?
Are there any tricks to drawing graphs quickly that you don't already know?
Another example is [tex]sin(x^2)[/tex]. (I already know what this looks like-- but how would I figure it out quickly if I didn't?).

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one: "Something that goes to zero dreadfully fast to each side, starting at x=0 with the value 1"

Second: Even function that oscillates faster and faster. The zeroes of the function is given by [itex]x=\sqrt{n\pi}[/itex] where n is some whole number.
 
For the first one, you would think that it approaches zero in the same way that [tex]e^{-x}[/tex] does-- i.e. concave up.
However, in reality, it is concave down. How do you explain this without taking the second derivative?
 
Well, you see that in a region around x=0, the curvature of the graph is negative, whereas further out on either side, the curvature changes sign and becomes positive.

So you are incorrect in believing it is always negative.
 
I know that it changes... however, it still doesn't look like [tex]e^{-x}[/tex].
And, referring to your first descriptions, my question was how you think of those properties-- I didn't want you to just tell me the properties.
 
1. I don't know what YOU mean by "look like"
2. I don't see the point of this silly thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K