Prefactor of classical electron radius

AI Thread Summary
The classical electron radius is derived by equating the energy of the electric field with mec², assuming the electron is a sphere of finite extent. The calculation of field energy requires a charge distribution, leading to prefactors of 3/5 or 1/2, which are often ignored. The discussion questions the rationale behind dropping these prefactors while retaining the factor of 1/4, suggesting that the prefactors are omitted for simplicity in "vague ballpark" calculations. It is noted that the factor of 4 is retained because it originates from physical constants rather than geometrical assumptions. The conversation highlights the complexity and arbitrariness of the assumptions made in these calculations.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi,

Assuming the electron is a sphere of finite extent, the classical electron radius is derived by equating the energy of the electric field with mec2. For the computation of the field energy, we have to assume a charge distribution. Both constant charge density and constant surface density lead to prefactors (3/5 or 1/2) which are somehow just ignored.

Why? If we are only interested in the order of magnitude, why drop these prefactors but keep 1/4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's just for "vague ballpark" calculation, yeah, since the prefactor depends on rather arbitrary assumptions (charges are on surface, or equally distributed). Regarding the factor 4 in the denominator, that one is likely left in there because it comes from the other physical constants, not the geometrical assumptions.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top