Preparation and naming of coordination compounds

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the formation of coordination compounds from Fe(II), H2O, Cl-, and NH4+. The user identifies one compound, [Fe(H2O)6]Cl2, and speculates on additional compounds, including (NH4)3[Fe(H2O)Cl5] and [Fe(H2O)3Cl3]Cl. The challenge lies in understanding why only three compounds are expected despite generating multiple possibilities based on coordination numbers and charges. The user concludes that without systematically listing all potential compounds, it is difficult to determine the exact number formed. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of coordination chemistry and the need for careful analysis of species involved.
Rujano
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi.
The combination of Fe(II), H2O, Cl- y NH4+ yields 3 coordination compounds, one of which is:

[Fe(H2O)6]Cl2

Which are the other ones?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Even though I sort of know how the compounds could be formed I don't why or rather , how can I tell that only 3 will be formed...

For instance, I think that some of the compounds could be:

(NH4)3[Fe(H2O)Cl5]

[Fe(H2O)3Cl3]Cl

(NH4)2[Fe(H2O)2Cl4]

How can I tell if they are correct? and how can I know that they should be three for example (in this case I already have four :S)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are talking about the co-ordination Number 6, then the following possibilities are there with Co-ordination Sphere:

1. Have +2 charge; [Fe(H2O)6]Cl2
2. Have +1 charge; [Fe(H2O)5Cl]Cl
3. Have 0 charge; [Fe(H2O)4Cl2]
4. Have -1 charge; NH4[Fe(H2O)3Cl3]
5. Have -2 charge; (NH4)2[Fe(H2O)2Cl4]
6. Have -3 charge; (NH4)3[Fe(H2O)Cl5]
7. Have -4 charge. (NH4)4[FeCl6]

See, I formed 6 or 7 compounds, So what could you be asking that the compulsory presence of mentioned species, either inside or outside the sphere. Then there can be 3.

Also, there's no way to tell what will happen until you write down all possible cases.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top