Preparing for a QFT Course with One Semester of Quantum

AI Thread Summary
One semester of quantum mechanics, particularly at the Griffiths level, may not provide sufficient preparation for a Quantum Field Theory (QFT) course like Peskin & Schroeder. A deeper understanding of quantum mechanics is often necessary, including familiarity with the Dirac equation, scattering theory, and spin in quantum contexts. Mastery of Green functions, complex integration, and foundational concepts such as the harmonic oscillator and Dirac notation is crucial for success in QFT. While it is possible to engage with QFT without a solid quantum background, the understanding may remain superficial, limiting the ability to grasp the underlying concepts. Supplementing Peskin's text with resources like Mandl and Shaw, Schrednicki, and Ryder can enhance comprehension. Griffiths' introduction to particle physics also offers valuable insights into QFT fundamentals.
lion8172
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Is one semester of quantum sufficient preparation for a QFT course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What level was your quantum class at and what level is the QFT being taught at?
 
The quantum class was at the level of Griffiths, and the QFT class is at the level of Peskin & Schroeder.
 
You will struggle in my opinion (under the assumption that you didn't spend too much time outside of Griffiths studying). I personally feel you need to really dig into QM a couple times before you start really feeling comfortable with it.

As an undergrad I was in your same position. My research adviser really wanted me to take his QFT class because it would have been super useful to me to have seen it for the research I was doing. In the end he decided against it for many reasons: You really should have seen the dirac equation, scattering theory, dealt with spin in QM context extensively, etc.

But only you know if you feel you are ready.
 
You will need to be very comfortable with Green functions and complex integration. Also, a solid quantum foundation in the harmonic oscillator and dirac notation. It can be done without a solid background in quantum...but to a certain extent your understanding will be superficial...i.e you could probably perform the calculations, but the context will be muddled.

I'm not too fond of peskin personally. I think if you used 'Mandl and Shaw' ,'Schrednecki' and Ryder to compliment Peskin then you might be ok. Also, Griffiths Intro to particle physics has a nice introductory section into QFT somewhere around chptr 11 I think. Introduces the QFT lagrangian for a scalar field and the Euler lagrange eqtns.
 
There's an interesting blog post by "Flip Tomato" here.
He writes about how to learn QFT as an undergraduate including prerequisites.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
258
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top