Preparing for Olympiad Exam: Tips & Suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter jobsism
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Olympiad
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on preparing for the Olympiad exam, emphasizing the importance of problem-solving practice over theoretical reading. The participant is studying "Mathematical Circles: A Russian Experience" but feels unprepared for high-level questions and seeks beginner-level book recommendations. Suggestions include engaging in deliberate practice and finding a qualified coach to enhance problem-solving skills. The conversation highlights the value of skilled coaching in achieving high scores in competitions like the Putnam. Overall, the emphasis is on consistent practice and seeking guidance to improve mathematical problem-solving abilities.
jobsism
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I had already posted an earlier thread, asking anyone if they could tell me whether a set of questions were high-level Olympiad questions, and whether I could prepare for such questions (for a certain examination) in 3 months.

However, this post is on a completely optimistic note; after looking at the ingenuity of the questions asked, and the fun in the math involved to solve them, I'm well damn determined to go to whatever extent to learn the math to solve such problems! :D

All I want to know now is whether my current preparation is sufficient; I'm currently studying from a book named "Mathematical Circles: A Russian Experience" by Dmitri Fomin, Sergey Genkin and Ilia Itenberg. The theory is easy to understand and the problems are intriguing. However, I'm still not at a level to solve the "high-level" ones (perhaps I will be able to, after completing the book). And I think the theory is a bit limited too. To have an idea of these "high-level" (atleast for me!) questions, here's a sample:-

1. Show that there are exactly 16 pairs of integers (x, y) such that 11x + 8y + 17 = xy.

2. A function g from a set X to itself satisfies g^m = g^n for positive integers m and n with m > n. Here g^n stands for g ◦ g ◦ · · · ◦ g (n times). Show that g is one-to-one if and only if g is onto.

3. Let a1, a2,...a100 be 100 positive integers. Show that for some m,n with 1<=m<=n<=100, ∑[i=m to n] a(subscript)i is divisible by 100.

4. In Triangle ABC, BE is a median, and O the mid-point of BE. The line joining A and O meets BC at D. Find the ratio AO : OD.

Are there any other beginner-level books, that cover most topics? I've already glanced at some of the famous ones like "Mathematical Olympiad Challenges" by Titu Andreescu, "The Art and Craft of Problem-Solving" by Paul Zeitz and "Problem-Solving Strategies" by Arthur Engel, but I don't feel comfortable using them.

Any other book suggestions/tips, anyone? Please help.

Thanks! :D
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you don't feel ready to start reading a problem solving book, find problems from less difficult competitions. You should be doing 99% problem solving, and 1% reading.
 
Looks like your preparing for CMI as well! Good luck !
 
In "Talent is Overrated, What REALLY separates World-Class Performers From Everybody Else" Geoff Colvin makes a very strong case for a method called "deliberate practice", which is very different from how most people "practice", and for finding a very qualified coach/trainer/tutor who can see your weaknesses much better than you can and who will work you mercilessly.

I should have/would have done that twenty years ago if I'd had the sense to realize it.

If anyone wants to dispute Colvin's argument then I'd love to see the evidence to back it up.

As I think I've written several times on these competition questions before, after listening to a couple of presentations by individuals who were long time graders and trainers for the Putnam, at least for the Putnam, being trained and coached by an individual who really understands what it takes to make the difference between getting one or two points versus getting almost full points on a problem... skilled coaching will make all the difference, assuming you have already developed an adequate skill set in problem solving.

If you want to score really really highly you should obviously go verify all this information with someone who is highly qualified.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
717
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
14K
Replies
125
Views
19K
Replies
5
Views
13K
Back
Top