Prereq Recommendations for Munkres' "Analysis on Manifolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diffy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prepare for Munkres' "Analysis on Manifolds," a solid foundation in Analysis, Algebra, and some understanding of Topology is recommended. Strong knowledge of Euclidean Geometry and Calculus is also beneficial. Familiarity with most of Rudin's "Principles of Mathematical Analysis," particularly the first chapters, is considered sufficient preparation, as Munkres' work builds on concepts from Analysis II. The discussion also clarifies that the referenced Rudin book is "Little Rudin," which is regarded as a classic in the field.
Diffy
Messages
441
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone.

I want to work through Munkres' "Analysis on Manifolds"

What maths would you recommend before I take on this book?

Will I be ok with a good foundation in Analysis and algebra, some understanding of topology, and strong Euclidean Geometry and Calc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diffy said:
Hey everyone.

I want to work through Munkres' "Analysis on Manifolds"

What maths would you recommend before I take on this book?

Will I be ok with a good foundation in Analysis and algebra, some understanding of topology, and strong Euclidean Geometry and Calc?

If you know most of the material in Rudin's "Principles in Mathematica Analysis" (except the last chapter) the you should be ready. "Analysis on Manifolds" is basically Analysis II and "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" is Analysis I.
 
ehrenfest said:
If you know most of the material in Rudin's "Principles in Mathematica Analysis" (except the last chapter) the you should be ready. "Analysis on Manifolds" is basically Analysis II and "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" is Analysis I.

I don't have that book, but I should since it is considered a classic. Is that Big Rudin or Little Rudin?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top